In the 1980’s, producers of eco-friendly textiles generally worked under the umbrella of organic food associations. However, they found that the food association was impractical for textile producers because although the growing and harvesting of food and fiber crops were similar, the processing of fibers in preparation to make fabric varied widely. The organic food associations were concerned primarily with food related issues. In addition, organic fabrics and fashion was being shown in specialized stores rather than in organic food markets.
In 2002, at the Intercot Conference in Dusseldorf, Germany, a workshop with representatives of organic cotton producers, the textile industry, consumers, standard organizations and certifiers discussed the need for a harmonized and world-wide recognized organic textile standard. The many different standards, they felt, was causing confusion and acting as a obstacle to international exchange and recognition of organic fabrics. As a result of this workshop, the “International Working Group on Global Organic Textile Standard“ (IWG) was founded, with an aim to work on the codification of various regional approaches and to develop a set of global standards. Members of this group included Internationale Verband der Naturtextilwirtschaft e. V.“ (IVN), the Organic Trade Association (United States), the Soil Association (England) and Japan Organic Cotton Association (Japan).
In 2006, their work was published as the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) , which has since evolved into the leading set of criteria in the field of organic textile processing. A main achievement of this group was the ability to compromise and to find even consensus for points that were considered to be ‘non-negotiable’. Not all standard organizations that participated the process ended up with signing the agreement of the Working Group.
From the GOTS website: “Since its introduction in 2006 by the International Working Group on Global Organic Textile Standard, the GOTS has gained universal recognition, led to abolishment of numerous previous similar standards of limited application and has become – with more than 2750 certified textile processing, manufacturing and trading operators in more than 50 countries and an abundance of certified products – the leading standard for the processing of textile goods using organic fibers, including environmentally oriented technical as well as social criteria.” This is a major accomplishment, especially given the global nature of the textile supply chain.
Beside the technical requirements a certifier has to meet to become approved by the IWG for GOTS certification, it is also a prerequisite that he discontinues use of any other certification. This measure was chosen to support the goal of a harmonized Global Standard and related certification system that allows certified suppliers to export their organic textiles with one certificate recognized in all relevant sales markets in order to strengthen the awareness and market for organic textiles.
The following standards have become completely harmonized with GOTS:
- North American Fiber Standard – Organic Trade Association (USA)
- Guidelines ‘Naturtextil IVN Zertifiziert’ – International Association Natural Textile Industry (Germany)
- Standards for Processing and Manufacture of Organic Textiles – Soil Association (England)
- EKO Sustainable Textile Standard – Control Union Certifications (formerly SKAL)
- Standards for Organic Textiles – Ecocert (France)
- Organic Textile Standard – ICEA (Italy)
- Standards for Organic Textiles – ETKO (Turkey)
- Organic Fiber Standards – Oregon Tilth (USA)
- Standards for Processing of Organic Textile Products – OIA (Argentina)
One member of the IWG offers beside GOTS as their basic standard one further standard for certification that complies with GOTS but contains some additional requirements:
- Guidelines ‘Naturtextil IVN Zertifiziert BEST’ – International Association Natural Textile Industry (Germany)
GOTS aims to define a universal standard for organic fabrics—from harvesting the raw materials, through environmentally and socially responsible manufacturing, to labeling—in order to provide credible assurance to consumers. Standards apply to fiber products, yarns, fabrics and clothes and cover the production, processing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, exportation, importation and distribution of all natural fiber products. GOTS provides a continuous quality control and certification system from field to shelf. A GOTS certified fabric is therefore much more than just a textile which is made from organic fibers.
Why is this a big deal? As we’ve said before, it’s like taking organic apples, and cooking them with Red Dye #2, preservatives, emulsifiers, and stabilizers – you can’t call the finished product organic applesauce. Same is true with fabrics, which contain as much as 27% (by weight) synthetic chemicals.
And in today’s world, with the complex supply chain that multinational companies like Wal-Mart, Nordstrom and Levi’s use, this is a very big deal. As companies attempt to get a handle on their suppliers and maintain quality control, the list of universally understood environmental criteria in GOTS is coming in handy. While consumers probably won’t see a GOTS tag on conventional cotton jeans, some companies are asking suppliers to use only GOTS-certified dyes and chemicals on conventional cotton clothing. In fact, the companies mentioned above, along with Banana Republic, H&M and Target are just some of the companies that plan to use GOTS certification for their organic products.
The GOTS standard includes:
- Harvesting criteria which requires the use of from 70% to 95% organic fiber.
- As the GOTS website explains, “As it is to date technically nearly impossible to produce any textiles in an industrial way without the use of chemical inputs, the approach is to define criteria for low impact and low residual natural and synthetic chemical inputs. So in addition to requiring that all inputs have to meet basic requirements on toxicity and biodegradability GOTS also prohibits entire classes of chemicals, rather than calling out specific prohibited chemicals. What that means is that instead of prohibiting, for example lead and cadmium (and therefore allowing other heavy metals by default), GOTS prohibits ALL heavy metals. Here’s the Version 3.0 list:
|Chlorophenols (such as TeCP, PCP)||Prohibited|
|Complexing agents and surfactants||Prohibited are: All APEOS, EDTA, DTPA, NTA, LAS, a-MES|
|Fluorocarbons||Prohibited (i.e., PFOS, PFOA)|
|Formaldehyde and short-chain aldehydes||Prohibited|
|Inputs containing functional nanoparticles||Prohibited|
|Inputs with halogen containing compounds||Prohibited|
|Plasticizers (i.e., Phthalates, Bisphenol A and all others with endocrine disrupting potential)||Prohibited|
|Quaternary ammonium compounds||Prohibited: DTDMAC, DSDMAC and DHTDM|
- Environmental manufacturing practices, with a written environmental policy, must be in place.
- Environmentally safe processing requirements, which includes wastewater treatment internally before discharge to surface waters, must be in place. This pertains to pH and temperature as well as to biological and chemical residues in the water.
- Environmentally sound packaging requirements are in place; PVC in packaging is prohibited, paper must be post-consumer recycled or certified according to FSC or PEFC.
- Labor practices are interpreted in accordance with the International Labor Organization (ILO – no forced, bonded, or slave labor; workers have the right to join or form trade unions and to bargain collectively; working conditions are safe and hygienic; there must be no new recruitment of child labor (and for those companies where children are found to be working, provisions must be made to enable him to attend and remain in quality education until no longer a child); wages paid must meet, at a minimum, national legal standards or industry benchmarks, whichever is higher; working hours are not excessive and inhumane treatment is prohibited.
- GOTS has a dual system of quality assurance consisting of on-side annual inspection (including possible unannounced inspections based on risk assessment of the operations) and residue testing.
- There are requirements surrounding exportation, importation and distribution of all natural fibers.
In June, 2011, The Global Organic Textile Standard launched an open comment period on it’s first revision draft of the new GOTS version 3.0. Following this announcement, IFOAM collected comments from its members and related stakeholders in order to shape the position of the movement towards the Global Organic Textile Standard.
A total of 36 persons and/or organizations sent their comments to IFOAM. Two important issues were raised: 90% of the respondents were against the use of nanotechnologies in organic textiles (5% abstention, 5% in favor), and 86 % were in principle against the use of synthetic chemicals in textiles labeled as organic (3% abstention, 11% in favor). Based on the feedback provided, IFOAM submitted detailed comments to GOTS and proposed:
- to further restrict the use of synthetic substances, possibly switching to a positive list of allowed substances, instead of a list of forbidden ones.
- to add requirements to ban the deliberate use of nano-technologies in the textile processing.
GOTS is a positive ethical choice among both consumers and producers and is the most comprehensive in terms of addressing environmental issues. Although it is difficult to obtain, it can lead to important strategic business benefits.
However, the GOTS certification applies to only natural fibers, so it cannot be applied to polyester or other synthetic fibers, which are by far the most popular fiber choice in the U.S. today. In addition, it does not directly address the carbon footprint of an organization or its production practices. (Please note: the choice of a fabric made of organically raised natural fibers has been shown to have a much lower carbon impact than any fabric made of synthetic fibers. We touched on that in our some of our blog posts; click here and here to read them.)
6 thoughts on “Global Organic Textile Standard”
First and foremost, thank you so much for your dedication to reporting on issues within the sustainable textile industry, that is well-researched and highly credible. I’ve been following your posts since May of this year, the information I have garnered is priceless, thank you for your due-diligence.
Aside from the accolades, I have a question regarding organic textile certification.
Fair Trade USA has launched a pilot program to offer Fair Trade Apparel certification for companies. Upon reading your post I feel like their certification might be duplicative to the certifications set by the GOTS, do you think this is a fruitless venture and maybe they should instead try to partner with GOTS?
Or could this be more condusive for smaller businesses who may not be able to afford GOTS costs? I’m just concerned because I’m totally for a harmonized and world-wide recognized organic textile standard and I feel like this may serve as counter-productive. I’d love to hear your thoughts!
Hi Kelli: Thanks for the great boost, we’re always happy to hear that we’re not speaking to the void.
Most Fair Trade certified products are concerned with the people involved and in making their lives better. As the Fair Trade USA website says: “We seek to empower family farmers and workers around the world, while enriching the lives of those struggling in poverty. Rather than creating dependency on aid, we use a market-based approach that empowers farmers to get a fair price for their harvest, helps workers create safe working conditions, provides a decent living wage and guarantees the right to organize.” So the purpose of Fair Trade is inherently different from that of GOTS. One explicit difference is that Fair Trade certified apparel and linens do not have to use organic cotton in the fabrication.
We did a post on Fair Trade issues and certification (https://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/fair-trade-what-does-it-mean/) in which we point out that the new Fair Trade USA certification, which is purported to be from “farm to finish”, applies only to cotton, and that is complicated enormously by the government subsidies of cotton in the USA. GOTS guarantees fair working conditions and fair wages for workers in the supply chain. GOTS also has the environmental component – requiring organic fibers, prohibiting use of toxic chemicals in the weaving and finishing of the fabrics, and requiring water treatment. And GOTS can be applied to the finished product , such as apparel or bedlinens, and it extends even to packaging of the goods (prohibiting PVC plastics, for example). And finally, GOTS does encompass all natural fibers.
Fair Trade and GOTS each have a different focus, and it’s too bad that they are mixed up in the consumers minds as being similar. The new Fair Trade USA certification which is supposed to cover the farm to finish product seems to be duplicating the work of GOTS, and as such I think it’s unnecessary and just adds to the confusion. These certifications are expensive to develop and administer – especially if done properly – so having another one on the market is counterproductive.
Thank you so much for the clarification, and based on your analysis, and my initial speculation, it indeed appears to be counter-productive…you gals rock!
Was led to your blog while searching for English websites on GOTS and other fair trade clothing standards. It’s great to see that the development of fair clothing is catching on fire – although it makes me sad that it needs boosts such as the catastrophes that recently occurred on Bangladesh.
Makes us sad too. I’m afraid our blog is not representative of what the general population here thinks – I wouldn’t, for example, use the term “catching fire” to describe it. Maybe “slowly dawning” might be more appropriate.
Dear Authors, Great job! I like your blog very much and have subscribed to it from almost a year, but read this article on GOTS today. I Would like to get in touch with you.
Could you please give me your email address at firstname.lastname@example.org