I just don’t know what it takes to change people’s habits. We need a huge wake up call about the disastrous state of our oceans! Our oceans are our life support system. And they’re in trouble.
Because this is a blog about textile issues, I wanted to remind you that the textile industry is the world’s #1 industrial polluter of fresh water. So remember that each time you choose a fabric that has been processed conventionally, in a mill which does not treat its wastewater, you’re adding to the problem. We’re all downstream. And please also remember that a fabric marked “organic cotton” – though decidedly better than conventional cotton – is still a fabric which is 27% synthetic chemicals by weight, processed at a mill which returned the untreated, chemically infused effluent to our oceans.
People once assumed that the ocean was so large that all pollutants would be diluted and dispersed to safe levels. But in reality, they have not disappeared – and some toxic man-made chemicals have even become more concentrated as they have entered the food chain.
Tiny animals at the bottom of the food chain, such as plankton in the oceans, absorb the chemicals as they feed. Because they do not break down easily, the chemicals accumulate in these organisms, becoming much more concentrated in their bodies than in the surrounding water or soil. These organisms are eaten by small animals, and the concentration rises again. These animals are in turn eaten by larger animals, which can travel large distances with their even further increased chemical load.
Animals higher up the food chain, such as seals, can have contamination levels millions of times higher than the water in which they live. And polar bears, which feed on seals, can have contamination levels up to 3 billion times higher than their environment.
Some scientists describe the chemical change in the ocean as throwing evolution into reverse: the chemical composition is going back toward the “primordial soup,” favoring the simplest organisms – indeed, algae, bacteria and jellyfish are growing unchecked – and threatening or eliminating the more complex. There are so many jellyfish in the ocean that many fisheries have given up their normal catch and are just harvesting jellyfish. Clickhere to view Jellyfish Gone Wild by the National Science Foundation. In fact, according to a report published in the Los Angeles Times, these most primitive organisms are exploding: it’s a ‘rise of slime’ as one scientist calls it. It’s killing larger species and sickening people.
A Los Angeles Times report in 2006 (click here to read the entire article) sounds like something from a horror movie: A spongy weed, reported to grow at 100 square meters per minute – literally fast enough to cover a football field sized area in an hour – has been plaguing fishermen in Australia. The culprit, it was found, is a strain of cyanobacteria known as Lyngbya majuscula, an ancestor of modern-day bacteria and algae that flourished 2.7 billion years ago. It has since shown up in at least a dozen places around the globe. It thrives in oxygen depleted water. Once established, Lyngbya creates its own nitrogen fertilizer from decaying parts of the plant.
Many fishermen in Moreton Bay avoid working in the four months every year that Lyngbya clogs their waters because it is highly toxic to them. When fishermen touch it, their skin breaks out in searing welts. Their lips blister and peel. As the weed blanketed miles of Moreton Bay over the last decade, it stained fishing nets a dark purple and left them coated with a powdery residue. When fishermen tried to shake it off the webbing, their throats constricted and they gasped for air.
After one man bit a fishing line in two, his mouth and tongue swelled so badly that he couldn’t eat solid food for a week.
Scientists in labs studying the bacteria couldn’t even be in the same room with it, the smell was so pungent. It’s like “The Blob” come to life.
Scientist Jeremy Jackson says that we have forgotten the basic rule of thumb: “Be careful what you dump in the swimming pool, and make sure the filter is working.”
And to add insult to our ocean’s injury, the number of dead zones – where there is so little oxygen only microbes can survive – has doubled every 10 years since the 1960s . In 2008, there were 400 dead zones . So does that make you worry? It should. This is an example of what mathematicians call “exponential growth”, and it’s the kind of thing that doesn’t really impact us until we’re about to be kicked in the teeth.
To demonstrate the concept, there is an old story about a king who was presented with a gorgeous handmade chessboard by one of his subjects. The king was delighted, and asked what the man wanted in return. The courtier surprised the king by asking for one grain of rice on the first square, two grains on the second, four grains on the third etc. The king readily agreed and asked for the rice to be brought. But there was not enough rice in the world to fill the courtier’s request (see note below) – the total amount of rice required would be 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains of rice. This is about 460 billion tons, or 6 times the entire weight of the Earth’s biomass.
And to see how the problem can become critical overnight (because according to the laws of exponential growth, the larger the quantity becomes, the faster it grows): Imagine having a pond with water lily leaves floating on the surface. The lily population doubles in size every day and if left unchecked will smother the pond in 30 days, killing all the other living things in the water. We want to save the pond, so we check the lilies every day. Yet day after day the plant seems small and so it is decided to leave it to grow until it half-covers the pond, before cutting it back. But the pond doesn’t becomes half covered until day 29 – leaving just one day to save the pond. (4)
This concept has even led to the phrase “second half of the chessboard”, which refers to a point where an exponentially growing factor begins to have a significant impact.
So this news about the ocean dead zones – you might think that a dead zone the size of the state of Oregon is no big deal, but the area is growing exponentially. How many years do we have until we reach the second half of the chessboard?
We must stop messing up our oceans. If not for yourself, do it for your children. “You wouldn’t let a child open up a cabinet under the sink and start tasting the chemicals down there,” Fabien Cousteau says. “So why would you dump those chemicals down the drain and have them end up on your plate, which you then feed to your child?” (5)
NOTE regarding rice on the chessboard:
The total number of grains of rice on the first half of the chessboard is 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 + 64 + 128 + 256 + 512 + 1024 … + 2,147,483,648, for a total of exactly 232 − 1 = 4,294,967,295 grains of rice, or about 100,000 kg of rice, with the mass of one grain of rice being roughly 25 mg.
The total number of grains of rice on the second half of the chessboard is 232 + 233 + 234 … + 263, for a total of 264 − 232 grains of rice. This is about 460 billion tonnes, or 6 times the entire weight of the Earth biomass.
On the 64th square of the chessboard there would be exactly 263 = 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice. In total, on the entire chessboard there would be exactly 264 − 1 = 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains of rice.
 http://www.thefishsite.com/articles/582/invasion-from-the-deep-jellyfish-swarms. To view Jellyfish Gone Wild by the National Science Foundation go to http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/jellyfish/index.jsp
 Diaz, Robert J., and Rosenberg, Rutger, “Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems”, Science, August 2008.
(4) Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. (1972) The Limits to Growth. New York: University Books. ISBN 0-87663-165-0
4 thoughts on “Our oceans and your textile choices”
But WHERE do you buy clothes and other textiles that don’t contribute to the problem? (And will I have to give up food and shelter to be able to afford clothes?)
Hi Debra: I know it’s really hard now to find textiles that don’t contribute to the problem – but they DO exist. We think any GOTS certified fabric is the gold standard now, and it’s pretty good. So ask! If manufacturers know it means something to us, and if you’re willing to look around till you find a suitable fabric, then they will start taking notice. Because most fabrics are not certified in any way, ANY third party certification helps – that would be certifications such as Oeko Tex or Cradle to Cradle, for example. And it depends on what you’re buying – I know Hanna Andersson sells Oeko Tex certified baby wear (I think it’s critically important for babies to have safe fabrics.) And take a leap of faith and support those companies that seem to be trying to do the right thing – like us – or Harmony Art! Our interiors fabrics are not nearly as expensive as many that are sold to interior designers which have famous names attached. In fact, we’re working on a retail website to make safe fabrics available for everybody (www.twosistersecotextiles.com – it’s not up just yet) which are affordable so families with young children, for example, can use them. And I know some big companies, like Target and Starbucks, are working on greening their supply chains. Target uses a lot of organic cotton – if you were to let them know it is important to you that they continue the trend by offering organic fabrics, then the market would really sit up and take notice.
But if we all throw up our hands and decide it’s all too much of a bother, then there will absolutely not be any progress.
the folks developing Milkymerino TM are doing their best. their scouring plant is set up to turn the waste into fertilizer that is to go back to the farms that have provided the wool. blending the wool with milk protein makes it washable without using superwash chemicals. i’m not entirely sure about the by-products from the milk side of things but on the plus side the product has anti-bacterial properties and seems well suited to infant wear
thank you for what you do and what you are writing. i am glad to be able to benefit from the extensive research you have done here, and am also a huge fan of harmony and will be looking forward to your new site mentioned in the comments. 🙂 the plight of the ocean is a subject close to my heart, as i am a marine biologist as well as a maker of organic cotton baby stuff. (earthhuggy.com) i just wanted to chime in and say i really appreciate your blog and the time and effort you put into writing on these super important topics.