We’re often asked if there are traces of pesticides in conventionally grown natural fibers – because people make the assumption that if pesticides are used on the plants, then there must be residuals in the fibers. And because the chemicals used on conventional cotton crops are among the most toxic known, such as aldicarb ( which can kill a man by just one drop absorbed thru the skin) and endosulfan (thought to be the most important source of fatal poisoning among cotton farmers in West Africa), as well as a host of confirmed carcinogens, that seems a reasonable cause for concern.
But that question misses the whole point, as we’ll explain.
According to the modern agricultural industry, cotton agriculture uses integrated pest management (IPM) systems to promote cotton’s environmental stance (author’s note: reduction of costs doesn’t hurt either).
IPM is a great advance on the part of agriculture to use biological controls. But 20 lbs. per acre is still a lot of really bad chemicals being used. So the Bremen Cotton Exchange, on behalf of the industry, has sponsored a series of tests which were carried out by the Hohehnstein Research Institute according to Oeko-Tex 100 Standard (also known as Eco Tex). They tested for 228 possible substances including:
- pH Value
- Heavy Metals
All the test series confirm that the treatment and use of pesticides in cotton production, according to their report, “does not pose any hazard for the processor of the raw material and none at all for the end consumer.” This is the industry’s position, based on the test results from their studies. On the other hand, there are other studies that do find pesticide residues in cotton textiles – of nine different organochlorine pesticides at levels of 0.5 to 2 mg/kg. So there seems to be a difference of opinion as to whether there are pesticide residues in the cotton fibers or finished cloth.
But there is not much difference of opinion in the fact that pesticide residues pollute our soils. Many different studies have found pesticide residues which pollute agriculture soils in various parts of the world. 
And just recently, Science News reported that children exposed in the womb to pesticides have lower IQs than do kids with virtually no exposure. According to Science News:
“Three new studies began in the late 1990s and followed children through age 7. Pesticide exposures stem from farm work in more than 300 low-income Mexican-American families in California, researchers from the University of California, Berkeley and their colleagues report. In two comparably sized New York City populations, exposures likely trace to bug spraying of homes or eating treated produce.”
Among the California families, the average IQ for the 20 percent of children with the highest prenatal organophosphate exposure was 7 points lower compared with the least-exposed group.
“There was an amazing degree of consistency in the findings across all three studies,” notes Bruce Lanphear of Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. And that’s concerning, he says, because a drop of seven IQ points “is a big deal. In fact, half of seven IQ points would be a big deal, especially when you see this across a population.”
There is no dispute about the fact that cotton crops are grown using many millions of pounds of chemical pesticides and synthetic fertilizers. And research shows that extensive and intensive use of synthetic fertilizers, soil additives, defoliants and other substances wreak terrible havoc on soil, water, air and many, many living things – such as in the study cited above.
So what is the point that’s being missed? Because conventional agriculture – despite advances in IPM – uses so many chemicals which are bad for us, shouldn’t the crops be grown organically? That cuts to the chase – in organically raised crops, there would be no toxic residues in the fibers, nor would the chemicals be wreaking havoc on our soils, water and air. So the question of whether there are pesticide residues in the fibers becomes moot. And though the United States and other countries might have banned the use of some chemicals, such as DDT, they’re still in use in parts of the world.
We’ve often touted the benefits of organic agriculture, and this seems to be yet another. We think organic farming is so important that we’ll spend some time on the subject in our next few posts – because there are some who say that organic farming is just not the answer. Are we between a rock and a hard place?
 Five of the top nine pesticides used on cotton in the U.S. (cyanide, dicofol, naled, propargite, and trifluralin) are known cancer-causing chemicals. All nine are classified by the U.S. EPA as Category I and II (dangerous chemicals).
 The purpose of the Bremen Cotton Exchange is “to maintain and promote the interests of all those connected with the cotton trade”.
 Zhang, X., Liao, Q and Zhang, Y, “Simultaneous determination of nine organochlorine pesticide residues in textile by high performance liquid chromatography, SEPU, 2007, 25(3), 380-383.
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/55465538/Insecticide-Residues-on-Cotton-Soils ALSO: Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Vol 1, Issue 1, 2007; “Pesticide Residues in Soil and Water from Four Cotton Growing Areas of Mali, West Africa ALSO: Luchini, LC et al., “Monitoring of pesticide residues in a cotton crop soil”, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, January 2000, 35(1): 51-9 SEE ALSO: http://www.bashanfoundation.org/ivan/ivanmapping.pdf